BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR RiPP IDENTIFICATION
Method: Support Vector Machine (SVM)
Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | MCC | AUC |
0.94 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR RiPP CLASS PREDICTION
MultiClass SVMClass | Sensitivity | Specificity | MCC |
LanthippeptideB | 0.89 | 0.98 | 0.88 |
LanthippeptideA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
LanthipeptideC | 0.67 | 0.99 | 0.76 |
Linaridin | 0.67 | 0.99 | 0.77 |
Cyanobactin | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.88 |
Sactipeptide | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Microcin | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Lassopeptide | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
Bacterial Head-to-Tail Cyclized Peptide | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Auto Inducing Peptide | 0.75 | 1 | 0.86 |
ComX | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Thiopeptide | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 |
Average Sensitivity is 0.78, Specificity is 0.99 and MCC is 0.82
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR LANTHIPEPTIDE CLEAVAGE PREDICTION
Total | Positive Set | Negative Set# | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | MCC |
2314 | 52 | 2262 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
#Note: The 'cost factor' has been used while training the classifier to adjust the diffrences
in counts of positive and negative datasets
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR LANTHIPEPTIDE CROSSLINKS PREDICTION
Method: Random Forest (RF)View Comparison of Predicted Crosslinks with Actual Structure for Lanthipeptides
Total | Positive Set | Negative Set# | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | MCC |
1576 | 218 | 1358 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
#Note: The 'cost factor' has been used while training the classifier to adjust the diffrences
in counts of positive and negative datasets
Method: Supoort Vector Machine (SVM)
Total | Positive Set | Negative Set# | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | MCC |
1576 | 218 | 1358 | 0.57 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
#Note: The 'cost factor' has been used while training the classifier to adjust the diffrences
in counts of positive and negative datasets
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR LASSOPEPTIDE CLEAVAGE & CROSSLINKS PREDICTION
Cleavage site Prediction AUC = 0.998CrossLinks
Total sequences | Correct prediction in top rank | Correct prediction in top 2 rank |
60 | 50(83.33%) | 55(91.67%) |
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR CYANOBACTINS CLEAVAGE & CROSSLINKS PREDICTION
1. Core peptide predictionTwo SVM Classifiers were used, one each for RSII and RSIII.
Model | AUC |
RSII Predictor | 0.96 |
RSIII | 0.95 |
2. Prediction of heterocycle rings
Total Fragments | 28 |
Positives (With Heterocycles) | 21 |
Positives (Without Heterocycles) | 7 |
AUC | 1 |
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR THIOPEPTIDE CROSSLINK PREDICTION
Total Sequences | 35 |
Correct Prediction | 28 |
Incorrect Prediction | 07 |
Accuracy | 80% |